This is a live show.
Tune in Saturday May 18th to Faction Talk, channel 103, at 4 PM East, 1 PM West.
Phone #: 844-686-5863
Twitter: @lefsetz
If you miss the episode, you can hear it on demand on the SiriusXM app. Search: Lefsetz
--
Visit the archive: http://lefsetz.com/wordpress/
--
Listen to the podcast:
-iHeart: https://ihr.fm/2Gi5PFj
-Apple: https://apple.co/2ndmpvp
--
http://www.twitter.com/lefsetz
--
If you would like to subscribe to the LefsetzLetter,
http://www.lefsetz.com/lists/?p=subscribe&id=1
If you do not want to receive any more LefsetzLetters, http://lefsetz.com/lists/?p=unsubscribe&uid=0eecea7b60b461717065cbde887c8e25
To change your email address http://lefsetz.com/lists/?p=preferences&uid=0eecea7b60b461717065cbde887c8e25
Friday, 17 May 2024
Re-YouTube/Music
YouTube is a great way to advertise, and it's free! For me, YouTube isn't about monetization (I have enough subscribers, but don't post material often enough to qualify). It's about creating awareness of my "brand" that's monetized in other ways.
Those "other ways" also promote the YouTube channel. For one of my eBooks, all the audio examples are in a YouTube video, with links to specific parts of the video for specific topics.
I think success today is all about creating a feedback loop. "Live gig/streams" is one obvious feedback loop, but there are many other ways to create feedback loops using the tools available today.
Thanks as always for your thought-provoking essays.
Craig Anderton
_________________________________
YouTube premium is one of the best deals in entertainment. It's actually less than $13.99 per month if you subscribe for a year and do it directly through YouTube instead of through Apple or another source. And in addition to ad-free YouTube, you also get ad-free YouTube Music, which has a huge catalog comparable to Spotify and Apple Music. Most of the "television" I watch is through YouTube on my flatscreen TV, so it's a great cable alternative for me. And many of the cable networks and news channels also have YT channels, so you can still get a good amount of the content you're missing by not having cable. I also subscribe to streaming networks like Hulu, Max, Peacock, and Netflix on and off as I need them, or for a year at a time if they have huge discounts deals, which some of them do.
Anthony Ferrara
_________________________________
Im a teacher now, working with teens and have kids of my own.
In the grand scheme YouTube is all that matters. Sports still brings people to tv but only for sports fans.
Every once in a while a show will get trendy (suits) and theyll binge it.
But YouTube is by far the most important aspect of their viewership. Theres an entire world of rockstar celebrities people have never heard of.
YouTube shorts have only entrenched the addictions and why not many kids are super worried about tiktok. They all say "eh youtube shorts is basically the same thing"
I dont see these kids ever shifting to "normal" television.
The future of content will look nothing like it does today.
Nick Lawson
_________________________________
yt premium - $14/mo - is all i have and i love it … and i watch everything … nothing compares.
Gary Mendel
_________________________________
One of my best recent days was when I paid for YouTube and got rid of the commercials. I could spend all day watching music gear demo videos, jam tracks and DIY build your own "whatever" stuff. I probably spend 50% of my TV viewing on YouTube.
We still pay for everything else and Hulu maybe comes in second. Tubi is free and has tons of surprising stuff.
Tim Redman
_________________________________
If Alphabet spun out YouTube completely what would it be worth? Same as Netflix? More?
It is a sleeping giant within the Alphabet that people dont really have their arms around, IMO.
Jake Malloy
_________________________________
Yes! You NAILED IT… RIGHT ON Bob! This is where the RIGHT undiscovered tunes/artists LIVE! It's where I go to discover and hear/see the music that matters to me, along with my Apple Music.
Olie Kornelsen
_________________________________
Hi Bob—I have YouTube Premium and it is 90% of my TV viewing. I'm watching podcasts, farmer and truck driver videos, old movies and documentaries, etc. Some of the content is just as well produced as anything on the networks. The choices are mindboggling. If it wasn't for live sports, I'd get rid of everything else.
Steven Monk
_________________________________
$13.99 per month and worth every penny. We are 62 and 73 years old and watch on our LG TV.
Us Ferbs
_________________________________
YouTube is pretty much all I watch. Get news from Canada, England, Scotland, Germany, France, (all in English).
Doug Thompson
_________________________________
I'm approaching 60 years old. My media habits have changed, and I personally believe COVID is responsible for accelerating the change. My time is spent with sporting events on my TV (often on as simple background noise) via the FloRacing app, the MLB app, or network sports events on YouTube TV. Toss in some Food Network programming, and that's about it for what used to be considered "cable" television.
Meanwhile, YouTube consumes a lot of time on my laptop and phone. I have a headphone obsession, and there is a lot of headphone content on YouTube. Pickleball Tournaments are on YouTube, in fact, my favorite pickleball player videos her rec games and puts them up on YouTube, garnering a thousand views each. If there are a thousand views of something that random and unimportant, imagine a thousand times a thousand times a thousand for other hobbies. I watch young people critique Yacht Rock songs. Old episodes of Craig Ferguson's Late Late Show. I watch a parrot who sings while his owner plays the guitar. I watched severe weather outbreaks with "Ryan Hall y'all" a few weeks ago, 110,000 people were watching.
Thanks,
Kevin Hillstrom
_________________________________
Everything makes it to YouTube..
If you like news, ALL the major domos have a channel..You can watch clips from CNN, MSNBC, ABC, etc..Without having to pay $120/month for cable! The minor domos are in the space, big time. The Don Lemons, Cuomoes, Tucker Carlsons, Megan Kellies, etc..I've seen some shorts of Bill O'Reilly, wearing more makeup than a Reno streetwalker (not quite as much as Dr. Phil's wife), yelling and railing against bloviating..
Like comedy? It's (YTube) the new Comedy Central..Don't get a Netflix deal? No worries.. EVERYBODY is on there.. George Carlin gains has a new audience, every decade..You can watch the talk show monologues..Maybe a guest interview, that YOU choose..Comedian podcasts..For FREE..
Like MUSIC? Watch videos, concerts, live feeds, interviews..Learn how to play songs and instruments.. Learn how to FIX SH*T! How to Cook.Exercise.Meditate.Speak Armenian. Darn socks.WHATEVS! And the PODCASTS! Why listen on a phone? WATCH them..On TV..(You should film yours, I'd gladly pay.)
You can tell everything you need to know about a person, from their YouTube feed..
My neighbor is 70..I showed him the ropes, when he cancelled cable..I visited recently, and perused his thumbnails..
Old TV shows.. They're ALL there..Free movies.Poker and chess strategists.. Diabetes doctors..Old songs, with young girls dancing to them..Trivia and history..Cat videos..
It's not that hard to figure out..The app comes pre-installed now..There's a You Tube button, ON THE REMOTE.. Seinfeld recently ranted about workers coming home, wanting to laugh, and turning on network TV..What century is HE living in!?
Not all creators get paid from the service itself..NOT a problem..The fans are often patrons, and send money and gifts to support their favorite channels..It's enough to live off of, for many ..
In some ways, Tik Tok follows the Chinese child labor factory system..All these kids toiling away, basically, for free..It's not exploitive, because you CAN get paid, if you KEEP working..(As opposed to Netflix, who pays for their product.)
You Tube is my desert island app..Not sure how the island would get WiFi or electric, but, you know..
James Spencer
_________________________________
The ads on YouTube are crazy, it's unwatchable because of the amount of ads, and I won't pay for something that's already making so much bank on ads, the whole service is such a scam it's unbelievable...
I'll watch it when I need to know something, or following a link, otherwise it's intolerable.
As far as streaming, they're trying to get back to me spending the same as when it was all or nothing cable, and THEY will have to get next to the new reality, which is if I have to start spending that much money, then I'm gonna start lopping off this or that service, there's always BitTorrent and/or videgames....in any case this version of Predatory Capitalism requires my consent and I do NOT.
They don't have a RIGHT to ever expanding profits, they have a right to TRY for them, and they're not trying in ways that work for me.
Create something amazing, something that I HAVE to see because it's so great (GOT/Sopranoes/LOTR/Dexter/etc fill in the blank), and yeh, I'll buy it for that because it's so good, but right now it looks like they're trying NOT to go long, instead filling the pipe with weird aftermarket bullsh*t, and stuff from other countries, which sometimes has a gem in there but is mostly half-assed junk.
And btw, ever noticed that so many of these new series have a really good premise and a decent first coupla episodes, and then quickly devolve into personality driven micro-dramas that most closely resemble soap operas, because it costs little to go straight into that scripting mill bs as opposed to fleshing out giant new ideas with the attendant effects and manpower etc? And nowadays they ALL do that, and for me that's unwatchable and obvious....
Wade Biery
_________________________________
You always talk about building a fan base from the bottom up and how important word of mouth is. Did you see the following article about the comedian who works in people's houses and is making a living. It's a fun read. https://www.vulture.com/article/zak-toscani-house-show-tour-diary.html
Perry Resnick
--
Visit the archive: http://lefsetz.com/wordpress/
--
Listen to the podcast:
-iHeart: https://ihr.fm/2Gi5PFj
-Apple: https://apple.co/2ndmpvp
--
http://www.twitter.com/lefsetz
--
If you would like to subscribe to the LefsetzLetter,
http://www.lefsetz.com/lists/?p=subscribe&id=1
If you do not want to receive any more LefsetzLetters, http://lefsetz.com/lists/?p=unsubscribe&uid=0eecea7b60b461717065cbde887c8e25
To change your email address http://lefsetz.com/lists/?p=preferences&uid=0eecea7b60b461717065cbde887c8e25
Those "other ways" also promote the YouTube channel. For one of my eBooks, all the audio examples are in a YouTube video, with links to specific parts of the video for specific topics.
I think success today is all about creating a feedback loop. "Live gig/streams" is one obvious feedback loop, but there are many other ways to create feedback loops using the tools available today.
Thanks as always for your thought-provoking essays.
Craig Anderton
_________________________________
YouTube premium is one of the best deals in entertainment. It's actually less than $13.99 per month if you subscribe for a year and do it directly through YouTube instead of through Apple or another source. And in addition to ad-free YouTube, you also get ad-free YouTube Music, which has a huge catalog comparable to Spotify and Apple Music. Most of the "television" I watch is through YouTube on my flatscreen TV, so it's a great cable alternative for me. And many of the cable networks and news channels also have YT channels, so you can still get a good amount of the content you're missing by not having cable. I also subscribe to streaming networks like Hulu, Max, Peacock, and Netflix on and off as I need them, or for a year at a time if they have huge discounts deals, which some of them do.
Anthony Ferrara
_________________________________
Im a teacher now, working with teens and have kids of my own.
In the grand scheme YouTube is all that matters. Sports still brings people to tv but only for sports fans.
Every once in a while a show will get trendy (suits) and theyll binge it.
But YouTube is by far the most important aspect of their viewership. Theres an entire world of rockstar celebrities people have never heard of.
YouTube shorts have only entrenched the addictions and why not many kids are super worried about tiktok. They all say "eh youtube shorts is basically the same thing"
I dont see these kids ever shifting to "normal" television.
The future of content will look nothing like it does today.
Nick Lawson
_________________________________
yt premium - $14/mo - is all i have and i love it … and i watch everything … nothing compares.
Gary Mendel
_________________________________
One of my best recent days was when I paid for YouTube and got rid of the commercials. I could spend all day watching music gear demo videos, jam tracks and DIY build your own "whatever" stuff. I probably spend 50% of my TV viewing on YouTube.
We still pay for everything else and Hulu maybe comes in second. Tubi is free and has tons of surprising stuff.
Tim Redman
_________________________________
If Alphabet spun out YouTube completely what would it be worth? Same as Netflix? More?
It is a sleeping giant within the Alphabet that people dont really have their arms around, IMO.
Jake Malloy
_________________________________
Yes! You NAILED IT… RIGHT ON Bob! This is where the RIGHT undiscovered tunes/artists LIVE! It's where I go to discover and hear/see the music that matters to me, along with my Apple Music.
Olie Kornelsen
_________________________________
Hi Bob—I have YouTube Premium and it is 90% of my TV viewing. I'm watching podcasts, farmer and truck driver videos, old movies and documentaries, etc. Some of the content is just as well produced as anything on the networks. The choices are mindboggling. If it wasn't for live sports, I'd get rid of everything else.
Steven Monk
_________________________________
$13.99 per month and worth every penny. We are 62 and 73 years old and watch on our LG TV.
Us Ferbs
_________________________________
YouTube is pretty much all I watch. Get news from Canada, England, Scotland, Germany, France, (all in English).
Doug Thompson
_________________________________
I'm approaching 60 years old. My media habits have changed, and I personally believe COVID is responsible for accelerating the change. My time is spent with sporting events on my TV (often on as simple background noise) via the FloRacing app, the MLB app, or network sports events on YouTube TV. Toss in some Food Network programming, and that's about it for what used to be considered "cable" television.
Meanwhile, YouTube consumes a lot of time on my laptop and phone. I have a headphone obsession, and there is a lot of headphone content on YouTube. Pickleball Tournaments are on YouTube, in fact, my favorite pickleball player videos her rec games and puts them up on YouTube, garnering a thousand views each. If there are a thousand views of something that random and unimportant, imagine a thousand times a thousand times a thousand for other hobbies. I watch young people critique Yacht Rock songs. Old episodes of Craig Ferguson's Late Late Show. I watch a parrot who sings while his owner plays the guitar. I watched severe weather outbreaks with "Ryan Hall y'all" a few weeks ago, 110,000 people were watching.
Thanks,
Kevin Hillstrom
_________________________________
Everything makes it to YouTube..
If you like news, ALL the major domos have a channel..You can watch clips from CNN, MSNBC, ABC, etc..Without having to pay $120/month for cable! The minor domos are in the space, big time. The Don Lemons, Cuomoes, Tucker Carlsons, Megan Kellies, etc..I've seen some shorts of Bill O'Reilly, wearing more makeup than a Reno streetwalker (not quite as much as Dr. Phil's wife), yelling and railing against bloviating..
Like comedy? It's (YTube) the new Comedy Central..Don't get a Netflix deal? No worries.. EVERYBODY is on there.. George Carlin gains has a new audience, every decade..You can watch the talk show monologues..Maybe a guest interview, that YOU choose..Comedian podcasts..For FREE..
Like MUSIC? Watch videos, concerts, live feeds, interviews..Learn how to play songs and instruments.. Learn how to FIX SH*T! How to Cook.Exercise.Meditate.Speak Armenian. Darn socks.WHATEVS! And the PODCASTS! Why listen on a phone? WATCH them..On TV..(You should film yours, I'd gladly pay.)
You can tell everything you need to know about a person, from their YouTube feed..
My neighbor is 70..I showed him the ropes, when he cancelled cable..I visited recently, and perused his thumbnails..
Old TV shows.. They're ALL there..Free movies.Poker and chess strategists.. Diabetes doctors..Old songs, with young girls dancing to them..Trivia and history..Cat videos..
It's not that hard to figure out..The app comes pre-installed now..There's a You Tube button, ON THE REMOTE.. Seinfeld recently ranted about workers coming home, wanting to laugh, and turning on network TV..What century is HE living in!?
Not all creators get paid from the service itself..NOT a problem..The fans are often patrons, and send money and gifts to support their favorite channels..It's enough to live off of, for many ..
In some ways, Tik Tok follows the Chinese child labor factory system..All these kids toiling away, basically, for free..It's not exploitive, because you CAN get paid, if you KEEP working..(As opposed to Netflix, who pays for their product.)
You Tube is my desert island app..Not sure how the island would get WiFi or electric, but, you know..
James Spencer
_________________________________
The ads on YouTube are crazy, it's unwatchable because of the amount of ads, and I won't pay for something that's already making so much bank on ads, the whole service is such a scam it's unbelievable...
I'll watch it when I need to know something, or following a link, otherwise it's intolerable.
As far as streaming, they're trying to get back to me spending the same as when it was all or nothing cable, and THEY will have to get next to the new reality, which is if I have to start spending that much money, then I'm gonna start lopping off this or that service, there's always BitTorrent and/or videgames....in any case this version of Predatory Capitalism requires my consent and I do NOT.
They don't have a RIGHT to ever expanding profits, they have a right to TRY for them, and they're not trying in ways that work for me.
Create something amazing, something that I HAVE to see because it's so great (GOT/Sopranoes/LOTR/Dexter/etc fill in the blank), and yeh, I'll buy it for that because it's so good, but right now it looks like they're trying NOT to go long, instead filling the pipe with weird aftermarket bullsh*t, and stuff from other countries, which sometimes has a gem in there but is mostly half-assed junk.
And btw, ever noticed that so many of these new series have a really good premise and a decent first coupla episodes, and then quickly devolve into personality driven micro-dramas that most closely resemble soap operas, because it costs little to go straight into that scripting mill bs as opposed to fleshing out giant new ideas with the attendant effects and manpower etc? And nowadays they ALL do that, and for me that's unwatchable and obvious....
Wade Biery
_________________________________
You always talk about building a fan base from the bottom up and how important word of mouth is. Did you see the following article about the comedian who works in people's houses and is making a living. It's a fun read. https://www.vulture.com/article/zak-toscani-house-show-tour-diary.html
Perry Resnick
--
Visit the archive: http://lefsetz.com/wordpress/
--
Listen to the podcast:
-iHeart: https://ihr.fm/2Gi5PFj
-Apple: https://apple.co/2ndmpvp
--
http://www.twitter.com/lefsetz
--
If you would like to subscribe to the LefsetzLetter,
http://www.lefsetz.com/lists/?p=subscribe&id=1
If you do not want to receive any more LefsetzLetters, http://lefsetz.com/lists/?p=unsubscribe&uid=0eecea7b60b461717065cbde887c8e25
To change your email address http://lefsetz.com/lists/?p=preferences&uid=0eecea7b60b461717065cbde887c8e25
Thursday, 16 May 2024
YouTube/Music
"What's on TV? For Many Americans, It's Now YouTube - People spent nearly 10% of their TV-viewing time watching the service, home to videos by creators like MrBeast"
Free link: https://t.ly/C7uPU
Seems obvious from afar, but the devil is in the details.
Yes, people are all over YouTube on their smartphones, on their tablets and computers. But those uses are not counted in the above statistic:
"YouTube's share of total TV time as measured by Nielsen looks only at the YouTube app on smart TVs, which is free and comes with ads (an ad-free version costs $13.99 a month)."
And if you've cut the cord and are using YouTube TV to watch CBS or ESPN, the channel gets the credit, not the platform.
Boy have we come a long way. Used to be that everybody was tech ignorant. They didn't know how to record on their VCRs, the television was seen as a dumb screen. But today, people are using Roku, et al, as well as the apps built into smart TVs, to watch YouTube.
Think about that. They're carrying YouTube around in their pocket all day, but they still want to sit on the couch and fire up YouTube on the flat screen. And they know how to do it!
Incredible.
Now 10% may seem low, until you realize that only the Disney channels have more.
In other words, the streamers and the traditional cable outlets are the Spotify Top 50, and YouTube is rock...and all the rest of the non-"hit" genres.
People don't want the mainstream stuff. They'd rather even watch amateur stuff than expensive Hollywood programming. We can analyze why, but that's secondary to the fact they do.
And the same thing is happening in music. People don't want the narrow lane stuff, the action is in the rest of the marketplace, stuff that never shows up in a hit playlist.
But you wouldn't know this reading the hype, all about this or that act breaking records.
Let me tell you, as big as the fan base is for K-Pop, those outside of the bubble don't care at all, and have no interest in caring, they're not paying attention.
And this is the case with so many "superstar" acts.
And the lift is much lighter in music, which is not Balkanized, pay your streaming service of choice ten or so dollars a month and you can listen to all the tunes, you get to click what you want, and active users click, passive users listen to playlists.
It's trending more and more in this direction. The share of superstar music listening keeps going down, while the great ignored by media mass keeps growing. But just like you can't make sense of the cornucopia of what's on YouTube, no one can make sense of the rest of the music pie, SO THEY IGNORE IT!
Oh, you'll see a review of this or that obscure act somewhere in the paper, but the truth is most of these other genres don't live on Spotify, but live. Streaming is just the come-on, to go to when you need a jolt, where you might do discovery. But once you're a fan, you go to the gig.
So we have all these acts that can sell tickets but can't have a "hit." Used to be the other way around, you needed a major label deal and a hit in order to be able to tour, now that is not the case.
This is the major labels' worst nightmare. They no longer have a monopoly on distribution, all they've got is their catalogs. Without them, they'd lose their leverage and a lot of their income and have to stop being lazy and compete.
Like in tech, where what you did yesterday does not matter. Everyone looks to the future.
As should musicians. Forget the past, it doesn't apply. If you're complaining that it's not the way it used to be, you're missing the point, and missing your mark. Today is different and it's never going back to what it once was. The public is hungry for all kinds of music, and it's your job to provide it. See the modern era as an opportunity, not as an impediment. Furthermore, for those complaining about low streaming payouts, how much do you think your 10,000 streams are worth? If you were paid $1000, it wouldn't make much of a difference. Just be thankful people can listen to your music essentially for free.
So for all these years we've been hearing about the battle between Netflix and the nascent streaming outlets, everybody's ignored YouTube, which lives on most TVs. Just like the non-"hit" music lives on Spotify, et al.
And YouTube doesn't even pay creators unless they hit a viewer threshold. But then it does, but the only way to make bank is to have a ton of views. What's the difference between this and Spotify? NOTHING!
People were shocked by this "Wall Street Journal" article. Just like they'd be shocked that many have ignored the Drake/Kendrick rap war as well as Taylor Swift. The media doesn't tell us this, but it's true. If you live in a bubble, that's fine, but don't tell us the rest of the world is interested or cares about your bubble.
And what goes viral on YouTube? You can't quantify it. Sure, train-wreck has a certain appeal, but other than that, it's about capturing something unique in a bottle, the zeitgeist. It's all about creativity. If you put out a video like someone else's viral video people laugh at you. No, you've got to go your own way. People are looking for something fresh, that titillates them, that they want to pass on to their friends.
Believe me, that's not a me-too hip-hop track. That's not news.
What is news, which is not covered by the news media, is innovation, bleeding edge stuff that no one sees until it gains mass.
That's how you make truly hit music and have a career.
--
Visit the archive: http://lefsetz.com/wordpress/
--
Listen to the podcast:
-iHeart: https://ihr.fm/2Gi5PFj
-Apple: https://apple.co/2ndmpvp
--
http://www.twitter.com/lefsetz
--
If you would like to subscribe to the LefsetzLetter,
http://www.lefsetz.com/lists/?p=subscribe&id=1
If you do not want to receive any more LefsetzLetters, http://lefsetz.com/lists/?p=unsubscribe&uid=0eecea7b60b461717065cbde887c8e25
To change your email address http://lefsetz.com/lists/?p=preferences&uid=0eecea7b60b461717065cbde887c8e25
Free link: https://t.ly/C7uPU
Seems obvious from afar, but the devil is in the details.
Yes, people are all over YouTube on their smartphones, on their tablets and computers. But those uses are not counted in the above statistic:
"YouTube's share of total TV time as measured by Nielsen looks only at the YouTube app on smart TVs, which is free and comes with ads (an ad-free version costs $13.99 a month)."
And if you've cut the cord and are using YouTube TV to watch CBS or ESPN, the channel gets the credit, not the platform.
Boy have we come a long way. Used to be that everybody was tech ignorant. They didn't know how to record on their VCRs, the television was seen as a dumb screen. But today, people are using Roku, et al, as well as the apps built into smart TVs, to watch YouTube.
Think about that. They're carrying YouTube around in their pocket all day, but they still want to sit on the couch and fire up YouTube on the flat screen. And they know how to do it!
Incredible.
Now 10% may seem low, until you realize that only the Disney channels have more.
In other words, the streamers and the traditional cable outlets are the Spotify Top 50, and YouTube is rock...and all the rest of the non-"hit" genres.
People don't want the mainstream stuff. They'd rather even watch amateur stuff than expensive Hollywood programming. We can analyze why, but that's secondary to the fact they do.
And the same thing is happening in music. People don't want the narrow lane stuff, the action is in the rest of the marketplace, stuff that never shows up in a hit playlist.
But you wouldn't know this reading the hype, all about this or that act breaking records.
Let me tell you, as big as the fan base is for K-Pop, those outside of the bubble don't care at all, and have no interest in caring, they're not paying attention.
And this is the case with so many "superstar" acts.
And the lift is much lighter in music, which is not Balkanized, pay your streaming service of choice ten or so dollars a month and you can listen to all the tunes, you get to click what you want, and active users click, passive users listen to playlists.
It's trending more and more in this direction. The share of superstar music listening keeps going down, while the great ignored by media mass keeps growing. But just like you can't make sense of the cornucopia of what's on YouTube, no one can make sense of the rest of the music pie, SO THEY IGNORE IT!
Oh, you'll see a review of this or that obscure act somewhere in the paper, but the truth is most of these other genres don't live on Spotify, but live. Streaming is just the come-on, to go to when you need a jolt, where you might do discovery. But once you're a fan, you go to the gig.
So we have all these acts that can sell tickets but can't have a "hit." Used to be the other way around, you needed a major label deal and a hit in order to be able to tour, now that is not the case.
This is the major labels' worst nightmare. They no longer have a monopoly on distribution, all they've got is their catalogs. Without them, they'd lose their leverage and a lot of their income and have to stop being lazy and compete.
Like in tech, where what you did yesterday does not matter. Everyone looks to the future.
As should musicians. Forget the past, it doesn't apply. If you're complaining that it's not the way it used to be, you're missing the point, and missing your mark. Today is different and it's never going back to what it once was. The public is hungry for all kinds of music, and it's your job to provide it. See the modern era as an opportunity, not as an impediment. Furthermore, for those complaining about low streaming payouts, how much do you think your 10,000 streams are worth? If you were paid $1000, it wouldn't make much of a difference. Just be thankful people can listen to your music essentially for free.
So for all these years we've been hearing about the battle between Netflix and the nascent streaming outlets, everybody's ignored YouTube, which lives on most TVs. Just like the non-"hit" music lives on Spotify, et al.
And YouTube doesn't even pay creators unless they hit a viewer threshold. But then it does, but the only way to make bank is to have a ton of views. What's the difference between this and Spotify? NOTHING!
People were shocked by this "Wall Street Journal" article. Just like they'd be shocked that many have ignored the Drake/Kendrick rap war as well as Taylor Swift. The media doesn't tell us this, but it's true. If you live in a bubble, that's fine, but don't tell us the rest of the world is interested or cares about your bubble.
And what goes viral on YouTube? You can't quantify it. Sure, train-wreck has a certain appeal, but other than that, it's about capturing something unique in a bottle, the zeitgeist. It's all about creativity. If you put out a video like someone else's viral video people laugh at you. No, you've got to go your own way. People are looking for something fresh, that titillates them, that they want to pass on to their friends.
Believe me, that's not a me-too hip-hop track. That's not news.
What is news, which is not covered by the news media, is innovation, bleeding edge stuff that no one sees until it gains mass.
That's how you make truly hit music and have a career.
--
Visit the archive: http://lefsetz.com/wordpress/
--
Listen to the podcast:
-iHeart: https://ihr.fm/2Gi5PFj
-Apple: https://apple.co/2ndmpvp
--
http://www.twitter.com/lefsetz
--
If you would like to subscribe to the LefsetzLetter,
http://www.lefsetz.com/lists/?p=subscribe&id=1
If you do not want to receive any more LefsetzLetters, http://lefsetz.com/lists/?p=unsubscribe&uid=0eecea7b60b461717065cbde887c8e25
To change your email address http://lefsetz.com/lists/?p=preferences&uid=0eecea7b60b461717065cbde887c8e25
John Ondrasik-This Week's Podcast
John Ondrasik, aka "Five for Fighting," recently returned from a performance of his song "OK" in Tel Aviv. We talk about this as well as John's songs about Afghanistan and Ukraine as well as his hits "Superman" and "100 Years" and how he made it. John is erudite and articulate, you'll want to listen to to this.
iHeart: https://www.iheart.com/podcast/1119-the-bob-lefsetz-podcast-30806836/episode/john-ondrasik-176787909/?cmp=web_share&embed=true
Amazon: https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/9ff4fb19-54d4-41ae-ae7a-8a6f8d3dafa8/episodes/f98e4904-5310-47b0-9a34-04008bd9e53e/the-bob-lefsetz-podcast-john-ondrasik
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/episode/6qCo4rw5FkqoMV0luNL6Vk?si=Y05sgQoCTLiKhQwX6FD7UQ
Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/john-ondrasik/id1316200737?i=1000655780074
--
Visit the archive: http://lefsetz.com/wordpress/
--
Listen to the podcast:
-iHeart: https://ihr.fm/2Gi5PFj
-Apple: https://apple.co/2ndmpvp
--
http://www.twitter.com/lefsetz
--
If you would like to subscribe to the LefsetzLetter,
http://www.lefsetz.com/lists/?p=subscribe&id=1
If you do not want to receive any more LefsetzLetters, http://lefsetz.com/lists/?p=unsubscribe&uid=0eecea7b60b461717065cbde887c8e25
To change your email address http://lefsetz.com/lists/?p=preferences&uid=0eecea7b60b461717065cbde887c8e25
iHeart: https://www.iheart.com/podcast/1119-the-bob-lefsetz-podcast-30806836/episode/john-ondrasik-176787909/?cmp=web_share&embed=true
Amazon: https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/9ff4fb19-54d4-41ae-ae7a-8a6f8d3dafa8/episodes/f98e4904-5310-47b0-9a34-04008bd9e53e/the-bob-lefsetz-podcast-john-ondrasik
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/episode/6qCo4rw5FkqoMV0luNL6Vk?si=Y05sgQoCTLiKhQwX6FD7UQ
Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/john-ondrasik/id1316200737?i=1000655780074
--
Visit the archive: http://lefsetz.com/wordpress/
--
Listen to the podcast:
-iHeart: https://ihr.fm/2Gi5PFj
-Apple: https://apple.co/2ndmpvp
--
http://www.twitter.com/lefsetz
--
If you would like to subscribe to the LefsetzLetter,
http://www.lefsetz.com/lists/?p=subscribe&id=1
If you do not want to receive any more LefsetzLetters, http://lefsetz.com/lists/?p=unsubscribe&uid=0eecea7b60b461717065cbde887c8e25
To change your email address http://lefsetz.com/lists/?p=preferences&uid=0eecea7b60b461717065cbde887c8e25
Monday, 13 May 2024
Loyalty
It comes from the internal, not the external. It comes from the identity of the performer, not the penumbra. Which is why it's much harder to create loyalty with a song written by committee using the producer and mixer du jour. It may sound like a previous hit, it may fit on the Spotify Top 50, but it won't engender loyalty, and the money is in loyalty.
That's what the major labels are into these days, creating digital products to monetize loyalty. Although they always take it too far, instead of rewarding the customer, they rip them off. A good example is the multiple iterations of vinyl. One is enough. Down the line the customer is going to lament having purchased four copies of the same LP, albeit with different covers. Loyalty is for the long haul.
In a business that does not believe in it. Especially on the recording side.
There's no money in it for the record executives. They don't own the company and they're not going to be there that long. It's not about investing for the future, it's all about the now, and the new and shiny, or the train-wreck, gains your attention to begin with, but then it wanes.
There's a greater focus on loyalty in the live sphere, but the only people who seem to do it well have come up from the bottom and are not yet superstars. They know their careers are based on their loyal customers, so they coddle them, offer them perks, to make them feel like members of the club, to incentivize them to not only be a fan themselves, but to bring their friends into the fold.
But should you play an arena on your first tour? You feel special if you see an act in a small venue. But when you're there with 15,000 others, you don't. And when you feel special there is a bond, there is loyalty. Which augurs for building from the bottom up, small to big. If you can't get a ticket, if the shows are all sold out, it only adds to the aura of the act. There's time to play arenas and stadiums down the line.
As for ticket prices... There are ways to keep them low and satiate the hard core and keep them loyal, but the truth is most acts don't want to do this, they don't want to go totally paperless and risk not selling out, the mania helps move tickets, the concept that you've got to buy now or you won't get in.
Furthermore, the most loyal fans are the ones paying for what was called platinum in the past, up close and personal for a higher price. Loyalty does not inherently mean a low price. Luxury cars are not cheap, but they tend to have the greatest loyalty. People like the product, and maybe the status too.
As for the penumbra, the brand extensions, the perfumes and clothing... It might be low-hanging fruit, but it's too far from the essence, the music. Unless the creator is a designer too. Kanye convinced his fans he had design talent, and it worked for him, for a while anyway, whereas it does not for most.
And for loyalty, sometimes you have to leave money on the table.
And loyalty is not assembling your fanbase to contact, impress and alienate nonbelievers. Like I say about Springsteen, I don't hate Bruce, I hate his fans. Self-satisfied Boomers and Gen-X'ers who go to every show, quote every lyric and can't stop talking about the Boss. And the dirty little secret is as much as Bruce is revered, he doesn't go clean everywhere, because the loyal audience is not as large as the casual audience.
Contrast this to Kenny Chesney. The shows are what make Kenny's fans loyal. Especially the stadium shows. There's a sense of community, you come every year, for a stacked bill of artists and Kenny's innovations and reciprocal love.
The king of loyalty was Jimmy Buffett. And Buffett never tried to convince everybody, he just spoke to the Parrotheads, his loyal fans, who gave him all their money because they loved being members of the club. Sure, Jimmy had hits, but ultimately it wasn't even about the hits, a new song at a show could connect with the audience just as well as an old one, assuming it was on topic and spoke to those in the building. Oftentimes the introduction was enough to get people to pay attention. Jimmy had a personality, he was 3-D, most acts today are not.
What is a prepubescent going to have to say. What does someone who has grown up in the spotlight have to say. It seems that those who grew off the radar and then blew up have the most loyal fans, like Metallica.
And you always need to ask yourself if something is "on brand." Not every opportunity is. Sure, something left field can be, because it makes the audience think. But when you have a generic act going through the paces just like everybody else, no loyalty is produced.
There's money in hit and run. But in today's world, where it's so hard to get noticed, why not put your effort into creating an act that makes loyal fans.
Loyalty starts off the radar. And loyalty is not trumpeted by the act, but third parties. You want Bloomberg to talk about loyalty, not some bloviating, self-promoting act. And loyal fans always want to know that they are primary. If you try to reach those outside the bubble, the loyal fan wonders if they are still primary.
Creativity comes first. When you listen to the music do you say you've never heard anything like this before? Do you dive deeper into the performer's lyrics? Do you need to go online to find out more about not only the act, but their beliefs? That's the starting point of loyalty.
Never mind most publicity not speaking to loyalty whatsoever. Not only does not it not make new fans, it might piss off the loyal fans.
You've got to think smaller today. You want the biggest cult audience you can achieve. It's not about worldwide domination, but domination in the life of your fans. Your fans will keep you alive.
Don't look at what others are doing, think about what is unique about you and double-down. And if your art is not unique, the odds of there being sustained demand for it are low. You've got to be different to draw people to you, and stay the course, once you sell out you sacrifice loyalty.
This is the way it used to be. But then MTV showed how much money you could make, and the CD delivered huge financial benefits, and then everybody started shooting for the stratosphere and everybody who didn't reach the stratosphere complained.
We are in the middle of a reset, akin to when FM took over from AM in the sixties. The Spotify Top 50 is AM. The rest is FM, where the heart and the action are. It's not about breaking records, but blowing minds. And minds are not blown by statistics, but songs.
--
Visit the archive: http://lefsetz.com/wordpress/
--
Listen to the podcast:
-iHeart: https://ihr.fm/2Gi5PFj
-Apple: https://apple.co/2ndmpvp
--
http://www.twitter.com/lefsetz
--
If you would like to subscribe to the LefsetzLetter,
http://www.lefsetz.com/lists/?p=subscribe&id=1
If you do not want to receive any more LefsetzLetters, http://lefsetz.com/lists/?p=unsubscribe&uid=0eecea7b60b461717065cbde887c8e25
To change your email address http://lefsetz.com/lists/?p=preferences&uid=0eecea7b60b461717065cbde887c8e25
That's what the major labels are into these days, creating digital products to monetize loyalty. Although they always take it too far, instead of rewarding the customer, they rip them off. A good example is the multiple iterations of vinyl. One is enough. Down the line the customer is going to lament having purchased four copies of the same LP, albeit with different covers. Loyalty is for the long haul.
In a business that does not believe in it. Especially on the recording side.
There's no money in it for the record executives. They don't own the company and they're not going to be there that long. It's not about investing for the future, it's all about the now, and the new and shiny, or the train-wreck, gains your attention to begin with, but then it wanes.
There's a greater focus on loyalty in the live sphere, but the only people who seem to do it well have come up from the bottom and are not yet superstars. They know their careers are based on their loyal customers, so they coddle them, offer them perks, to make them feel like members of the club, to incentivize them to not only be a fan themselves, but to bring their friends into the fold.
But should you play an arena on your first tour? You feel special if you see an act in a small venue. But when you're there with 15,000 others, you don't. And when you feel special there is a bond, there is loyalty. Which augurs for building from the bottom up, small to big. If you can't get a ticket, if the shows are all sold out, it only adds to the aura of the act. There's time to play arenas and stadiums down the line.
As for ticket prices... There are ways to keep them low and satiate the hard core and keep them loyal, but the truth is most acts don't want to do this, they don't want to go totally paperless and risk not selling out, the mania helps move tickets, the concept that you've got to buy now or you won't get in.
Furthermore, the most loyal fans are the ones paying for what was called platinum in the past, up close and personal for a higher price. Loyalty does not inherently mean a low price. Luxury cars are not cheap, but they tend to have the greatest loyalty. People like the product, and maybe the status too.
As for the penumbra, the brand extensions, the perfumes and clothing... It might be low-hanging fruit, but it's too far from the essence, the music. Unless the creator is a designer too. Kanye convinced his fans he had design talent, and it worked for him, for a while anyway, whereas it does not for most.
And for loyalty, sometimes you have to leave money on the table.
And loyalty is not assembling your fanbase to contact, impress and alienate nonbelievers. Like I say about Springsteen, I don't hate Bruce, I hate his fans. Self-satisfied Boomers and Gen-X'ers who go to every show, quote every lyric and can't stop talking about the Boss. And the dirty little secret is as much as Bruce is revered, he doesn't go clean everywhere, because the loyal audience is not as large as the casual audience.
Contrast this to Kenny Chesney. The shows are what make Kenny's fans loyal. Especially the stadium shows. There's a sense of community, you come every year, for a stacked bill of artists and Kenny's innovations and reciprocal love.
The king of loyalty was Jimmy Buffett. And Buffett never tried to convince everybody, he just spoke to the Parrotheads, his loyal fans, who gave him all their money because they loved being members of the club. Sure, Jimmy had hits, but ultimately it wasn't even about the hits, a new song at a show could connect with the audience just as well as an old one, assuming it was on topic and spoke to those in the building. Oftentimes the introduction was enough to get people to pay attention. Jimmy had a personality, he was 3-D, most acts today are not.
What is a prepubescent going to have to say. What does someone who has grown up in the spotlight have to say. It seems that those who grew off the radar and then blew up have the most loyal fans, like Metallica.
And you always need to ask yourself if something is "on brand." Not every opportunity is. Sure, something left field can be, because it makes the audience think. But when you have a generic act going through the paces just like everybody else, no loyalty is produced.
There's money in hit and run. But in today's world, where it's so hard to get noticed, why not put your effort into creating an act that makes loyal fans.
Loyalty starts off the radar. And loyalty is not trumpeted by the act, but third parties. You want Bloomberg to talk about loyalty, not some bloviating, self-promoting act. And loyal fans always want to know that they are primary. If you try to reach those outside the bubble, the loyal fan wonders if they are still primary.
Creativity comes first. When you listen to the music do you say you've never heard anything like this before? Do you dive deeper into the performer's lyrics? Do you need to go online to find out more about not only the act, but their beliefs? That's the starting point of loyalty.
Never mind most publicity not speaking to loyalty whatsoever. Not only does not it not make new fans, it might piss off the loyal fans.
You've got to think smaller today. You want the biggest cult audience you can achieve. It's not about worldwide domination, but domination in the life of your fans. Your fans will keep you alive.
Don't look at what others are doing, think about what is unique about you and double-down. And if your art is not unique, the odds of there being sustained demand for it are low. You've got to be different to draw people to you, and stay the course, once you sell out you sacrifice loyalty.
This is the way it used to be. But then MTV showed how much money you could make, and the CD delivered huge financial benefits, and then everybody started shooting for the stratosphere and everybody who didn't reach the stratosphere complained.
We are in the middle of a reset, akin to when FM took over from AM in the sixties. The Spotify Top 50 is AM. The rest is FM, where the heart and the action are. It's not about breaking records, but blowing minds. And minds are not blown by statistics, but songs.
--
Visit the archive: http://lefsetz.com/wordpress/
--
Listen to the podcast:
-iHeart: https://ihr.fm/2Gi5PFj
-Apple: https://apple.co/2ndmpvp
--
http://www.twitter.com/lefsetz
--
If you would like to subscribe to the LefsetzLetter,
http://www.lefsetz.com/lists/?p=subscribe&id=1
If you do not want to receive any more LefsetzLetters, http://lefsetz.com/lists/?p=unsubscribe&uid=0eecea7b60b461717065cbde887c8e25
To change your email address http://lefsetz.com/lists/?p=preferences&uid=0eecea7b60b461717065cbde887c8e25
WPP Stream
https://wppstream.com
I don't go anywhere where I don't know anybody anymore.
This was a feature of growing up. Especially college. You walked in alone and you had to find your way, you talked to this person and that, trying to find your group. Maybe it's different at the state school where people go home on weekends, but if you're in the hinterlands at a private institution, you're all thrown in together, with none of the status markers of regular society to divide you, you all were accepted, you're all equal, now you've got to find your way.
But it's not only college, it's kindergarten, maybe high school, but especially summer camp. You start off sans status, all you've got is your personality, your ability to integrate. On your mark, get set, GO!
I'm only now experiencing the cost of lockdown. I got too isolated for too long. And so much that used to be out is now in. Even medical appointments, they're virtual. And you rarely have to talk to anybody on the phone, texting systems are incredible, you can make and break appointments, and I appreciate that, but raw socialization, it's fallen by the wayside.
I was in the swing of things prior to March 2020. I was scheduled to go away ten days later. It was an endless merry-go-round, from here to there to there, I didn't think twice, I counted my airline miles to find out how far I was from the next level of status, I was in the groove. But it's different now.
There are fewer events. A lot have not picked up again. And I got older, which changes your perspective and others' perception of you.
Which is all to say I was anxious about coming to Stream. Because of the challenge of navigating the people, the relationships. I know from the past that eventually you find your place, you fit in, but my social anxiety coupled with lockdown... Let me just say it's easier to stay home. And easier to say no to that which you've done again and again. I mean how many times can you see ____________ again. I want new and different experiences, but mostly they come via streaming television.
WPP is the world's largest advertising company. "WPP" stands for "Wire and Plastic Products," it's just a shell upon which Martin Sorrell built the empire. Sorrell was exiled in a contretemps I'll leave to your own research, and now Mark Read is the CEO. And at Stream the CEO is accessible, and I love talking to the top dog, to gain information, to see what makes them tick.
So Stream is held multiple places over the year. It's a free conference of WPP employees and affiliates and clients and tech leaders and... Well, me!
Fewer than two hundred people, the sessions are created by the attendees. There's a big board, anyone can start a group. So it's not the usual topics. And you banter and try to get to the truth.
And there are dinners and fun and...
I just arrived today and I've already had my most stimulating conversation of the year. How does creativity interface with AI? Not from the perspective that the sky is falling, but the role of each. And how do you make the financial winners more creative and vice versa. We live in a world where money is everything, but the world runs on culture, which gets pooh-poohed. It's all about STEM, but how often do you go to dinner and discuss coding?
My anxiety has not completely evaporated. Then again, based on past Stream conferences it will only be a matter of time before I meet more people more intimately. And, once again, the level of discussion is higher than I'm used to in the music business. I already feel the excitement of analysis. It's fun to be where everybody is equal, where the ideas trump the totems.
--
Visit the archive: http://lefsetz.com/wordpress/
--
Listen to the podcast:
-iHeart: https://ihr.fm/2Gi5PFj
-Apple: https://apple.co/2ndmpvp
--
http://www.twitter.com/lefsetz
--
If you would like to subscribe to the LefsetzLetter,
http://www.lefsetz.com/lists/?p=subscribe&id=1
If you do not want to receive any more LefsetzLetters, http://lefsetz.com/lists/?p=unsubscribe&uid=0eecea7b60b461717065cbde887c8e25
To change your email address http://lefsetz.com/lists/?p=preferences&uid=0eecea7b60b461717065cbde887c8e25
I don't go anywhere where I don't know anybody anymore.
This was a feature of growing up. Especially college. You walked in alone and you had to find your way, you talked to this person and that, trying to find your group. Maybe it's different at the state school where people go home on weekends, but if you're in the hinterlands at a private institution, you're all thrown in together, with none of the status markers of regular society to divide you, you all were accepted, you're all equal, now you've got to find your way.
But it's not only college, it's kindergarten, maybe high school, but especially summer camp. You start off sans status, all you've got is your personality, your ability to integrate. On your mark, get set, GO!
I'm only now experiencing the cost of lockdown. I got too isolated for too long. And so much that used to be out is now in. Even medical appointments, they're virtual. And you rarely have to talk to anybody on the phone, texting systems are incredible, you can make and break appointments, and I appreciate that, but raw socialization, it's fallen by the wayside.
I was in the swing of things prior to March 2020. I was scheduled to go away ten days later. It was an endless merry-go-round, from here to there to there, I didn't think twice, I counted my airline miles to find out how far I was from the next level of status, I was in the groove. But it's different now.
There are fewer events. A lot have not picked up again. And I got older, which changes your perspective and others' perception of you.
Which is all to say I was anxious about coming to Stream. Because of the challenge of navigating the people, the relationships. I know from the past that eventually you find your place, you fit in, but my social anxiety coupled with lockdown... Let me just say it's easier to stay home. And easier to say no to that which you've done again and again. I mean how many times can you see ____________ again. I want new and different experiences, but mostly they come via streaming television.
WPP is the world's largest advertising company. "WPP" stands for "Wire and Plastic Products," it's just a shell upon which Martin Sorrell built the empire. Sorrell was exiled in a contretemps I'll leave to your own research, and now Mark Read is the CEO. And at Stream the CEO is accessible, and I love talking to the top dog, to gain information, to see what makes them tick.
So Stream is held multiple places over the year. It's a free conference of WPP employees and affiliates and clients and tech leaders and... Well, me!
Fewer than two hundred people, the sessions are created by the attendees. There's a big board, anyone can start a group. So it's not the usual topics. And you banter and try to get to the truth.
And there are dinners and fun and...
I just arrived today and I've already had my most stimulating conversation of the year. How does creativity interface with AI? Not from the perspective that the sky is falling, but the role of each. And how do you make the financial winners more creative and vice versa. We live in a world where money is everything, but the world runs on culture, which gets pooh-poohed. It's all about STEM, but how often do you go to dinner and discuss coding?
My anxiety has not completely evaporated. Then again, based on past Stream conferences it will only be a matter of time before I meet more people more intimately. And, once again, the level of discussion is higher than I'm used to in the music business. I already feel the excitement of analysis. It's fun to be where everybody is equal, where the ideas trump the totems.
--
Visit the archive: http://lefsetz.com/wordpress/
--
Listen to the podcast:
-iHeart: https://ihr.fm/2Gi5PFj
-Apple: https://apple.co/2ndmpvp
--
http://www.twitter.com/lefsetz
--
If you would like to subscribe to the LefsetzLetter,
http://www.lefsetz.com/lists/?p=subscribe&id=1
If you do not want to receive any more LefsetzLetters, http://lefsetz.com/lists/?p=unsubscribe&uid=0eecea7b60b461717065cbde887c8e25
To change your email address http://lefsetz.com/lists/?p=preferences&uid=0eecea7b60b461717065cbde887c8e25
Sunday, 12 May 2024
CMAT
If this were the old days you'd know who I was talking about.
I'm reading the new Kristin Hannah book "The Women." I loved 2018's "The Great Alone," unfortunately the sequel, "The Four Winds," is not as good, but that didn't put me off reading "The Women." I'm hooked on the plot, but this is not literary fiction, this is a disappointment, despite being a huge best seller, furthermore one of the main characters, the Black nurse Barb, is not fleshed out. However, it is interesting to read a book set in the Vietnam era, Hollywood seemingly having exhausted the topic.
But I was getting lightheaded, needing sustenance, so I put it down and...
Picked up my phone. I wanted to know if there was any new news. You know, if the world had blown up. But when I checked the major outlets and saw this was not the case I devolved to Apple News+, an endless scroll of sticky headlines usually with very little nutrition once you click through, but a headline in the Sunday "Times" caught my eye. The LONDON "Times," not the NEW YORK "Times."
And here's where I contradict myself. In more ways than one. I just told you how worthless the stories on Apple News+ are but now I'm going to tell you you need to subscribe, you HAVE TO subscribe, it's only ten bucks a month and it's the best news investment you'll make. However, best to ignore the endless scroll and just read the publications you choose, which include a cornucopia of titles, from "The Washington Post" to "The Wall Street Journal," never mind "The New Yorker" and "The Atlantic." We live in the information age now more than ever before, and he or she with the most information wins. That's why your smartphone is so valuable, it's your link to information. Yes, the world runs on reading and if you don't, you're out of the loop. And sure, you can read your biased blogs, but if you don't read the more mainstream publications you don't have your finger on the pulse of the zeitgeist.
The other contradiction is that I found CMAT via publicity, hype, a newspaper story after I told you publicity was worthless. Then again, CMAT has gotten a smattering of publicity in the United States but it doesn't seem to have made a dent, unless you're an information junkie like me you wouldn't know that CMAT was nominated for International Artist of the Year at the Brits, the English music awards that have some of the gravitas the Grammys lack, if for no other reason than there are many fewer categories.
Actually, if you search the news you'll also find out that CMAT has gotten accolades and publicity in the U.K., as a matter of fact:
"It (CMAT's debut) was named the second best album of 2023 by the Observer and earned her a place on the BBC Sound of 2024 list, as well as the Brit nomination."
And:
"The two LPs have already made her a superstar in Ireland, both going to number one, with the debut winning the Choice Music Prize for Irish album of the year."
BBC: https://t.ly/bv16v
And she's been bullied to boot!
You'd think she'd have an impact in the U.S., but unless you work for her, you're probably clueless, like me.
But this article in the "Times" said CMAT was beloved by Elton John and Robbie Williams, the headline said:
"CMAT, the Irish country star loved by Elton John and Robbie Williams Ciara Mary-Alice Thompson talks to Blanca Schofield about grappling with trolls, acting with Paul Mescal and baring (nearly) all at the Brits"
Unfortunately, unless you pay for a subscription to the "Times," which not many U.S. citizens do, certainly not lefties, you can't read this article. But if you have a subscription to Apple News+ you can: https://t.ly/wezxg (And sometimes you can read articles in the feed for free, click the link, it might work for you.) Information is very expensive, if you don't pay you will end up ignorant. Sorry to insult you, but this is the truth.
But I read the article after clicking through to Spotify. Elton and Robbie Williams both like this singer, I've got to check her out.
And I was stunned. Her music was positively palatable. I immediately got it, didn't want to turn it off, let it play through.
But I'm not going to provide a link, because I don't want the hatred.
Yes, I'm on react. But the world is black and white, and people either agree with you or they don't, and they respond accordingly, especially if they don't.
I was caught completely off guard. Listening to CMAT was like listening to Elton himself, when you dropped the needle initially. You didn't have to hear the songs many times to get them, you got them upon initial play and they only grew upon you.
Not that CMAT sounds like Elton. I'd put her closer to Fleetwood Mac. Or even the sixties.
But CMAT does not sound like she's competing in the rap wars. She doesn't sound like a Disney star with a thin voice making vapid pop. She sounds like an artist. Not someone prepubescent, but 28.
And I'm going through the songs, looking for a clunker, and I can't find one. Research tells me there's a new single, "Aw, Shoot!," and that was good too. Too often you like one track, but not the rest, but that is not the case with CMAT.
I get it, we no longer live in a monoculture. Therefore you don't have to listen to anything you don't like, and there's a solid chance you won't like CMAT. But I'd posit that more people would like the music of CMAT than many of the tunes in the U.S. Spotify Top 50, her music has melody and a genuine quality oftentimes lacking in today's "hit" music. It's made for the mood, not the money.
Not that you'll hear it on radio. The terrestrial outlets in the U.S. aren't spinning it. And I didn't see it on a plethora of Spotify playlists.
So nothing is happening. Which stuns me. Here's an act that a great swath of the public would resonate with if they only heard it. But they're not.
--
Visit the archive: http://lefsetz.com/wordpress/
--
Listen to the podcast:
-iHeart: https://ihr.fm/2Gi5PFj
-Apple: https://apple.co/2ndmpvp
--
http://www.twitter.com/lefsetz
--
If you would like to subscribe to the LefsetzLetter,
http://www.lefsetz.com/lists/?p=subscribe&id=1
If you do not want to receive any more LefsetzLetters, http://lefsetz.com/lists/?p=unsubscribe&uid=0eecea7b60b461717065cbde887c8e25
To change your email address http://lefsetz.com/lists/?p=preferences&uid=0eecea7b60b461717065cbde887c8e25
I'm reading the new Kristin Hannah book "The Women." I loved 2018's "The Great Alone," unfortunately the sequel, "The Four Winds," is not as good, but that didn't put me off reading "The Women." I'm hooked on the plot, but this is not literary fiction, this is a disappointment, despite being a huge best seller, furthermore one of the main characters, the Black nurse Barb, is not fleshed out. However, it is interesting to read a book set in the Vietnam era, Hollywood seemingly having exhausted the topic.
But I was getting lightheaded, needing sustenance, so I put it down and...
Picked up my phone. I wanted to know if there was any new news. You know, if the world had blown up. But when I checked the major outlets and saw this was not the case I devolved to Apple News+, an endless scroll of sticky headlines usually with very little nutrition once you click through, but a headline in the Sunday "Times" caught my eye. The LONDON "Times," not the NEW YORK "Times."
And here's where I contradict myself. In more ways than one. I just told you how worthless the stories on Apple News+ are but now I'm going to tell you you need to subscribe, you HAVE TO subscribe, it's only ten bucks a month and it's the best news investment you'll make. However, best to ignore the endless scroll and just read the publications you choose, which include a cornucopia of titles, from "The Washington Post" to "The Wall Street Journal," never mind "The New Yorker" and "The Atlantic." We live in the information age now more than ever before, and he or she with the most information wins. That's why your smartphone is so valuable, it's your link to information. Yes, the world runs on reading and if you don't, you're out of the loop. And sure, you can read your biased blogs, but if you don't read the more mainstream publications you don't have your finger on the pulse of the zeitgeist.
The other contradiction is that I found CMAT via publicity, hype, a newspaper story after I told you publicity was worthless. Then again, CMAT has gotten a smattering of publicity in the United States but it doesn't seem to have made a dent, unless you're an information junkie like me you wouldn't know that CMAT was nominated for International Artist of the Year at the Brits, the English music awards that have some of the gravitas the Grammys lack, if for no other reason than there are many fewer categories.
Actually, if you search the news you'll also find out that CMAT has gotten accolades and publicity in the U.K., as a matter of fact:
"It (CMAT's debut) was named the second best album of 2023 by the Observer and earned her a place on the BBC Sound of 2024 list, as well as the Brit nomination."
And:
"The two LPs have already made her a superstar in Ireland, both going to number one, with the debut winning the Choice Music Prize for Irish album of the year."
BBC: https://t.ly/bv16v
And she's been bullied to boot!
You'd think she'd have an impact in the U.S., but unless you work for her, you're probably clueless, like me.
But this article in the "Times" said CMAT was beloved by Elton John and Robbie Williams, the headline said:
"CMAT, the Irish country star loved by Elton John and Robbie Williams Ciara Mary-Alice Thompson talks to Blanca Schofield about grappling with trolls, acting with Paul Mescal and baring (nearly) all at the Brits"
Unfortunately, unless you pay for a subscription to the "Times," which not many U.S. citizens do, certainly not lefties, you can't read this article. But if you have a subscription to Apple News+ you can: https://t.ly/wezxg (And sometimes you can read articles in the feed for free, click the link, it might work for you.) Information is very expensive, if you don't pay you will end up ignorant. Sorry to insult you, but this is the truth.
But I read the article after clicking through to Spotify. Elton and Robbie Williams both like this singer, I've got to check her out.
And I was stunned. Her music was positively palatable. I immediately got it, didn't want to turn it off, let it play through.
But I'm not going to provide a link, because I don't want the hatred.
Yes, I'm on react. But the world is black and white, and people either agree with you or they don't, and they respond accordingly, especially if they don't.
I was caught completely off guard. Listening to CMAT was like listening to Elton himself, when you dropped the needle initially. You didn't have to hear the songs many times to get them, you got them upon initial play and they only grew upon you.
Not that CMAT sounds like Elton. I'd put her closer to Fleetwood Mac. Or even the sixties.
But CMAT does not sound like she's competing in the rap wars. She doesn't sound like a Disney star with a thin voice making vapid pop. She sounds like an artist. Not someone prepubescent, but 28.
And I'm going through the songs, looking for a clunker, and I can't find one. Research tells me there's a new single, "Aw, Shoot!," and that was good too. Too often you like one track, but not the rest, but that is not the case with CMAT.
I get it, we no longer live in a monoculture. Therefore you don't have to listen to anything you don't like, and there's a solid chance you won't like CMAT. But I'd posit that more people would like the music of CMAT than many of the tunes in the U.S. Spotify Top 50, her music has melody and a genuine quality oftentimes lacking in today's "hit" music. It's made for the mood, not the money.
Not that you'll hear it on radio. The terrestrial outlets in the U.S. aren't spinning it. And I didn't see it on a plethora of Spotify playlists.
So nothing is happening. Which stuns me. Here's an act that a great swath of the public would resonate with if they only heard it. But they're not.
--
Visit the archive: http://lefsetz.com/wordpress/
--
Listen to the podcast:
-iHeart: https://ihr.fm/2Gi5PFj
-Apple: https://apple.co/2ndmpvp
--
http://www.twitter.com/lefsetz
--
If you would like to subscribe to the LefsetzLetter,
http://www.lefsetz.com/lists/?p=subscribe&id=1
If you do not want to receive any more LefsetzLetters, http://lefsetz.com/lists/?p=unsubscribe&uid=0eecea7b60b461717065cbde887c8e25
To change your email address http://lefsetz.com/lists/?p=preferences&uid=0eecea7b60b461717065cbde887c8e25
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)